The Carbon Footprint of Synthetic Socks vs. Natural Fibers

From production to disposal, the carbon footprint of your clothing matters. Synthetic materials often rely on petroleum-based processes, while natural fibers come from renewable resources.

1. Production Impact
   Producing synthetics like polyester or nylon involves significant energy usage and harmful greenhouse gas emissions. Natural fibers grow organically, requiring fewer chemical inputs. Although animal based fibres produce more CO2 emissions compared to plant grown fibres, they still do not match the severity of fully synthetic fibres. Additionally with their improved quality a pair of cashmere socks will last you way longer than synthetic socks thus distributing the CO2 emissions over a longer period of time. 
   
   
2. Decomposition and Microplastics
   Synthetic socks can shed microplastics into waterways and take centuries to decompose. Natural fibers break down faster, reducing long-term environmental harm.
   
   
   
3. Making an Informed Choice
   Switching to natural fiber socks is a small but meaningful step. At AMO & Oak, we work with high-quality, responsibly sourced materials to ensure both comfort and lower carbon impact.
   
   

Conclusion:
Every purchase has a footprint. By choosing natural fibers, you help reduce environmental harm while enjoying superior warmth and comfort.

Shop Eco-Friendly Options →

Photo by Francois Le Nguyen on Unsplash

Photo by Omkar Jadhav on Unsplash